ReviewBiomolecules2025
The Years 2015-2025 as a Prospective Decade for the Identification of Specific Methylation Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of Progression and Challenges for Intervention in the Natural History of Early Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy in Advanced Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2026Review
- An Interferon-Response Transcriptomic Signature of Lymphovascular Invasion in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For ten years, DNA methylation appeared as a major step in the understanding and issues of prostate cancers. Indeed, although classical biochemical parameters are still useful for prostate cancer diagnosis, they have poor sensitivity and are not specific for prostate cancer subtypes. The recent boom in the identification of specific DNA methylation profiles and the rapid development of liquid biopsies have completely modified the care of patients and may greatly influence outcomes in the future. Indeed, DNA methylation modifications could substantially improve the diagnosis by identifying specific prostate subtypes, improve follow-up to monitor residual disease, improve therapeutic efficiency by predicting the response to treatment, and improve the health quality of patients since these epigenetic modifications can easily be detected in non-invasive liquid biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.