In one paragraphArticle in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
11 authors.
Geize Aparecida DeonDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos 13565-905, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3374-2233 Tariq EzazInstitute of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4763-1347 José Henrique Forte StornioliFaculdade de Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Bauru 17033-360, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7919-0262 Rodrigo Zeni Dos SantosFaculdade de Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Bauru 17033-360, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anderson José Baia GomesInstituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia, Abaetetuba 68440-000, Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3887-3283 Príncia Grejo SettiDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos 13565-905, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6773-3856 Edivaldo Herculano Correa de OliveiraLaboratório de Citogenômica e Mutagênese Ambiental, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Ananindeua 67030-000, Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-3352 Fábio Porto-ForestiFaculdade de Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Bauru 17033-360, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8845-3845 Ricardo UtsunomiaFaculdade de Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Bauru 17033-360, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thomas LiehrInstitute of Human Genetics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1672-3054 Marcelo de Bello CioffiDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos 13565-905, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-1464 Funding
Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/14096-6Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2023/00955-2
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Bats are great models for studying repetitive DNAs due to their compact genomes and extensive chromosomal rearrangements. Here, we investigated the repetitive DNA content of two phyllostomid bat species,
Indexed as
ChiropteraEvolution, MolecularKaryotypeRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsDNA, SatelliteFemaleKaryotypingMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenySex ChromosomesDNA, Satellitecytogenomicsmultiple sex chromosomessatellitometelomeric repeats
Identifiers
PMID41008555
PMCPMC12467311
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390