ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Bridging Gaps in Holistic Rehabilitation After Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHolistic care in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) addresses the full spectrum of patient needs-physical, emotional, psychological, social, spiritual, and environmental-to support recovery and improve long-term outcomes after critical illness.
objectiveThis systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of holistic care interventions across these six dimensions of wellness in adult ICU patients.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The SPICE framework was used to define the scope (Setting: ICU; Perspective: patients; Intervention: holistic care; Comparison: standard care; Evaluation: multi-dimensional outcomes). Studies published in English between 1999 and 2024 were included. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tools.
resultsSeven studies, comprising randomized controlled trials, observational, and mixed-methods designs, met the inclusion criteria. The interventions were diverse, encompassing corporeal rehabilitation, spiritual care toolkits, reflexology, early physical therapy, patient diaries, and family involvement. A narrative synthesis of these heterogeneous studies suggested potential benefits and high acceptability for various patient-centered outcomes.
conclusionsThe limited but promising evidence indicates that holistic care interventions may contribute positively to ICU patient recovery. The findings underscore the need for more robust, high-quality research to conclusively determine their efficacy and support their integration into standard critical care practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.