ArticleBrain sciences2025
Brain Cortical Area Characterization and Machine Learning-Based Measure of Rasmussen's S-R-K Model.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundthe Skill, Rule, and Knowledge (S-R-K) model is a framework used to describe and analyze human behaviour and decision-making in complex environments based on the nature of the task and kind of cognitive control required. The S-R-K model is particularly useful in fields like human factor engineering, system design, and safety-critical industries because it helps to understand human errors and how they relate to different levels of cognitive control. However, the S-R-K model is still qualitative and lacks specific and quantifiable metrics for determining what kind of cognitive control a person is using at any given time. This aspect makes difficult to directly measure and compare performance across the three levels. This study aimed therefore to characterize the S-R-K model from a neurophysiological perspective by analyzing the operator's cerebral cortical activity.
methodsin this study, participants carried out experimental tasks able to replicate the Skill (tracking task), Rule (rule-based navigation) and Knowledge conditions (unfamiliar situations).
resultsparticipants' Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded during tasks execution and then Global Field Power (GFP) was estimated in the different EEG frequency bands. Brodmann areas (BAs) and EEG features were then used to characterize the S-R-K pattern over the cerebral cortex and as inputs to build up the machine learning-based model to estimate participants' cognitive control behaviours while dealing with tasks.
conclusionsthe results demonstrate the possibility of objectively measuring the different S, R and K levels in terms of brain activations. Furthermore, such evidence is consistent with the scientific literature in terms of cognitive functions corresponding to the different levels of cognitive control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.