ReviewBrain sciences2025
Immunological Targets in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: Where Are We Going Now?
Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision Oncology in Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Therapeutic Horizons and Implementation Barriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Assessing efgartigimod dosing patterns and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living outcomes in clinical practice: results from a large patient support program database.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Identification of rs28362336 as a risk SNP for generalized myasthenia gravis and its impact on HCG27 regulation.PloS one · 2026Article
- The immune microenvironment and population heterogeneity in myasthenia gravis: implications for precision therapeutics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Emergency use of eculizumab in impending and manifest myasthenic crisis: a retrospective case series.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeneralized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disorder marked by antibody-mediated disruption of neuromuscular transmission. Despite advancements in immunosuppressive therapies and biologics, a subset of patients remains refractory, necessitating more targeted and personalized treatment strategies.
objectiveThis review aims to synthesize current knowledge of the immunopathological mechanisms across gMG subtypes and to explore emerging therapeutic targets tailored to these diverse disease phenotypes.
methodsA narrative review was conducted, integrating recent findings from clinical trials, immunogenetic studies, and preclinical research to describe subtype-specific immune mechanisms and corresponding therapeutic innovations.
resultsgMG subtypes-characterized by autoantibody profiles (AChR, MuSK, LRP4, or seronegative), thymic histopathology, and age of onset-demonstrate distinct immunological pathways. Early-onset MG is associated with thymic hyperplasia and Th17-driven inflammation; thymoma-associated MG involves central tolerance breakdown; late-onset MG shows immune senescence and altered T-cell regulation. MuSK- and LRP4-positive MG exhibit unique cytokine and antibody signatures. Novel therapeutic strategies include B cell- and T cell-targeted therapies (e.g., anti-CD19, anti-CD38, JAK inhibitors), cytokine inhibitors (IL-6, IL-17, IL-23), FcRn antagonists, complement inhibitors, and gene- or cell-based therapies such as CAR-T and CAAR-T cells.
conclusionThe evolving landscape of gMG treatment reflects a shift toward immunopathology-based precision medicine. Better characterization of subtype-specific molecular signatures and immune dysfunctions is essential to guide clinical decision-making and improve outcomes for treatment-refractory patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.