Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41008319›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2025

Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Significant but Overlooked Association.

Polona Rus Prelog, Matija Zupan, Senta Frol

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Polona Rus PrelogCentre for Clinical Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-9328-0915
Matija ZupanFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Senta FrolFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-9494-160X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is an increasingly recognized cause of cognitive decline and lobar intracerebral hemorrhage in older adults. Recent research highlights that neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPSs)-including depression, anxiety, apathy, and irritability-are highly prevalent in CAA, often emerging prior to overt cognitive impairment or major vascular events. Compared to other cerebrovascular diseases, CAA presents a distinctive and multifaceted NPS profile, with symptoms closely linked to disease severity and neuroimaging biomarkers such as white matter hyperintensities and microbleeds. Critically, NPSs in CAA can complicate cognitive assessment and predict worse functional outcomes, yet remain underappreciated in clinical and research contexts. Management is complicated by pharmacologic risks-including heightened bleeding risk associated with SSRIs and novel anti-amyloid therapies-underscoring the need for individualized and multidisciplinary approaches. We highlight the urgent need for standardized NPS assessment, targeted research into mechanisms and treatment, and greater integration of neuropsychiatric evaluation into CAA care. We suggest that recognizing NPSs as core clinical features-not secondary complications-of CAA is essential to improving both patient outcomes and scientific understanding. Future studies should focus on longitudinal analyses, the development of tailored interventions, and robust comparative research to clarify the pathophysiology, clinical trajectory, and optimal management of NPSs in CAA.

Indexed as

anxietyapathycerebral amyloid angiopathycerebral microbleedscognitive impairmentdepressionintracerebral hemorrhageneuropsychiatric symptomssmall vessel disease

Identifiers

PMID41008319
PMCPMC12467706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.