ArticleBrain sciences2025
Interpretable Disorder Signatures: Probing Neural Latent Spaces for Schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, and Autism Stratification.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A CNN-BiLSTM-GRU and attention-integrated hybrid network for epileptic seizure detection.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to develop and validate an interpretable deep learning framework that leverages self-supervised time reversal (TR) pretraining to identify consistent, biologically plausible functional network biomarkers across multiple neurological and psychiatric disorders.
methodsWe pretrained a hierarchical LSTM model using a TR pretext task on the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset. The pretrained weights were transferred to downstream classification tasks on five clinical datasets (FBIRN, BSNIP, ADNI, OASIS, and ABIDE) spanning schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease, and autism spectrum disorder. After fine-tuning, we extracted latent features and employed a logistic regression probing analysis to decode class-specific functional network contributions. Models trained from scratch without pretraining served as a baseline. Statistical tests (one-sample and two-sample
resultsTR pretraining consistently improved classification performance in four out of five datasets, with AUC gains of up to 5.3%, particularly in data-scarce settings. Probing analyses revealed biologically meaningful and consistent patterns: schizophrenia was associated with reduced auditory network activity, Alzheimer's with disrupted default mode and cerebellar networks, and autism with sensorimotor anomalies. TR-pretrained models produced more statistically significant latent features and demonstrated higher consistency across datasets (e.g., Pearson correlation = 0.9003 for schizophrenia probing vs. -0.67 for non-pretrained). In contrast, non-pretrained models showed unstable performance and inconsistent feature importance.
conclusionsTime Reversal pretraining enhances both the performance and interpretability of deep learning models for fMRI classification. By enabling more stable and biologically plausible representations, TR pretraining supports clinically relevant insights into disorder-specific network disruptions. This study demonstrates the utility of interpretable self-supervised models in neuroimaging, offering a promising step toward transparent and trustworthy AI applications in psychiatry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.