ArticleBrain sciences2025
Entropy and Complexity in QEEG Reveal Visual Processing Signatures in Autism: A Neurofeedback-Oriented and Clinical Differentiation Study.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Emerging Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in EEG-Based Autism Research: A Systematic Review.NeuroSci · 2026Review
- Quantitative electroencephalography as a next-generation tool in neurodiagnostics: significance, clinical applications, and practical interpretative frameworks.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Quantitative EEG (QEEG) offers potential for identifying objective neurophysiological biomarkers in psychiatric disorders and guiding neurofeedback interventions. This study examined whether three nonlinear QEEG metrics-Lempel-Ziv Complexity, Tsallis Entropy, and Renyi Entropy-can distinguish children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from typically developing (TD) peers, and assessed their relevance for neurofeedback targeting. (2) Methods: EEG recordings from 19 scalp channels were analyzed in children with ASD and TD. The three nonlinear metrics were computed for each channel. Group differences were evaluated statistically, while machine learning classifiers assessed discriminative performance. Dimensionality reduction with t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) was applied to visualize clustering. (3) Results: All metrics showed significant group differences across multiple channels. Machine learning classifiers achieved >90% accuracy, demonstrating robust discriminative power. t-SNE revealed distinct ASD and TD clustering, with nonlinear separability in specific channels. Visual processing-related channels were prominent contributors to both classifier predictions and t-SNE cluster boundaries. (4) Conclusions: Nonlinear QEEG metrics, particularly from visual processing regions, differentiate ASD from TD with high accuracy and may serve as objective biomarkers for neurofeedback. Combining complexity and entropy measures with machine learning and visualization techniques offers a relevant framework for ASD diagnosis and personalized intervention planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.