Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41008282›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2025

Unlocking Creative Movement with Inertial Technology.

Eva Sánchez Martz, Alejandro Romero-Hernandez, Beatriz Calvo-Merino, Santiago Fernández González

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva Sánchez MartzExperimental Psychology Department, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0001-4568-6558
Alejandro Romero-HernandezSoftware Engineering and Artificial Intelligence Department, Computers Science School, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4996-4789
Beatriz Calvo-MerinoDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Center for Clinical Social and Cognitive Neuroscience, City St. George's, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4669-4573
Santiago Fernández GonzálezExperimental Psychology Department, Complutense University of Madrid, 28223 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6616-3991

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examined the influence of creative thinking, shaped by different forms of episodic mental representations, on human movement. The primary objective was to investigate how creativity, elicited through distinct cognitive stimuli, affects movement variability.

methodsTwenty-four professional dancers developed two original dance phrases, each inspired by either a visual or a narrative mental representation. Movement data were collected via inertial sensor technology and subsequently analysed to determine differences in motor expression.

resultsThe results indicated that movements performed under narrative representation conditions exhibited significantly increased risk-taking behaviour, greater movement amplitude, and a higher overall movement volume compared to those guided by visual stimuli.

conclusionsThese findings underscore the role of creativity in modulating both the expressive and physical dimensions of human movement. Moreover, this research demonstrates the potential of inertial sensor technology not only to capture kinematic patterns but also to provide insight into the deeper layers of human artistic and cognitive processes.

Indexed as

cognitive neurosciencecognitive performancedance creationimageryinertial sensorsmental representationmovement analysis

Identifiers

PMID41008282
PMCPMC12468073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.