Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41008262›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2025

Optimizing Gait Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease: The Effects of Musical Groove and Familiarity.

Emily A Ready, Jeffrey D Holmes, Eryn P Lonnee, Jessica A Grahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily A ReadyDepartment of Psychology, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Jeffrey D HolmesSchool of Occupational Therapy, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Eryn P LonneeCentre for Brain and Mind, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-7810-2106
Jessica A GrahnDepartment of Psychology, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7270-2114

Funding

CIHR 201312MSH-322177-223372James S. McDonnell Foundation DOI:10.37717/220020403Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council 566202-2021-SMFSU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParkinson's Disease (PD) is a neurological condition that can severely impair gait, often through changes to gait parameters including stride length, velocity, and variability. Therapeutic interventions such as Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS

methodsTo address this, we explored the effects of familiarity, groove, beat perception ability, and synchronization instructions on gait in patients with PD during accelerated auditory cues. Individuals with idiopathic PD were randomized to walk freely or synchronized to music and metronome cues played 10% faster than their baseline walking cadence. Musical stimuli varied in self-reported familiarity and perceived groove and beat perception ability was assessed to classify participants as good or poor beat perceivers.

resultsOverall, high-groove music and synchronized walking elicited faster gait patterns compared to low-groove music and free walking, respectively, as demonstrated by increased gait velocity and cadence. Familiarity and beat perception ability did not significantly affect gait in individuals with PD. DISCUSSION: Altogether, our results indicate that high-groove music and synchronized walking lead to the greatest gait improvements during cueing, regardless of beat perception ability.

conclusionFuture studies and clinical interventions should consider stimulus type and synchronization instructions when implementing cueing therapies for gait dysfunction in PD in order to optimize treatment responses.

Indexed as

gaitmusicParkinson’s diseaserhythmic auditory stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41008262
PMCPMC12467459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.