Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41008135›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluation of Bioprocess-Based Technique for Iron and Zinc Fortification in Red Rice Genotypes.

Sai Sruthi Shree Kavitha Kumaravel, Nagarajan Srividya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sai Sruthi Shree Kavitha KumaravelDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, Anantapur 515001, India.ORCID 0009-0006-9287-9375
Nagarajan SrividyaDepartment of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, Anantapur 515001, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2965-7391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) deficiencies, globally prevalent nutritional disorders, underscore the need for effective fortification strategies in staple foods like rice. This study evaluates a bioprocess-based technique for single (SF) and double fortification (DF) of two heritage red rice genotypes (Chennangi-CH, Karungkuruvai-KK) to enhance mineral content and bioavailability. Whole rice grains were germinated in sodium iron EDTA and zinc chloride solutions (SF: 50 and 100 mg/L Fe/Zn; DF: Fe + Zn at a 2:1 ratio). Mineral quantification via microwave plasma atomic emission spectrometry (MPAES) revealed that SF significantly increased fortified mineral content but reduced accessibility of the non-fortified mineral. In contrast, DF substantially enhanced both Fe (2-fold) and Zn (7-fold) content while improving bioaccessibility (Fe: 2-2.5x; Zn: 3-7x), supported by reduced phytate levels. Both genotypes exhibited high Zn accumulation and retention. Cooked DF rice has good sensory acceptability and improved cooking characteristics. At daily consumption levels of 30-150 g, DF rice could meet 16-70% of Fe and nearly 100% Zn Recommended Dietary Intake (RDI) across age groups. This simple, scalable bioprocessing method effectively enhances Fe and Zn bioavailability in wholegrains, offering a promising solution to combat micronutrient deficiencies through dietary staples, contributing to Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 2 and 3) by promoting accessible nutrition for healthier populations.

Indexed as

bioaccessibilityChennangicooking qualitydouble fortificationEDIgerminationheritage riceiron fortificationKarungkuruvaizinc fortification

Identifiers

PMID41008135
PMCPMC12469940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.