Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41008074›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Identifying Network Propagation Sources Using Advanced Centrality Measures.

Damian Frąszczak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Damian FrąszczakInstitute of Information Systems, Faculty of Cybernetics, Military University of Technology, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4412-4430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We live in a time dominated by interconnected networks surrounding us on all fronts. The emergence of social media platforms has driven the expansion of social networks, facilitating fast communication worldwide. Responses to content shared on these platforms can be seen as a propagation process, where information spreads through social networks. Analyzing propagation graphs presents a significant challenge in identifying sources, which is crucial in various fields. This includes detecting the origins of disinformation, identifying patient zero in an epidemic, and tracing the initial sources of viral trends or malware. Numerous studies have attempted to identify these sources using methods similar to centrality measures which assign a value indicating the likelihood of being a source. While centrality measures are a popular topic, with many new measures introduced each year, only a few have been explored in the context of source identification. This article explores a wide range of centrality measures in the context of source identification. The results help identify the most effective measures and pave the way for the development of more efficient detection techniques. Additionally, an analysis was conducted considering multiple hops in the propagation network, providing deeper insights into the impact of extended neighborhood structures on detection performance.

Indexed as

centrality measurespropagation graphpropagation source identificationsocial network

Identifiers

PMID41008074
PMCPMC12469922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.