ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Ascertaining Susceptibilities in Smart Contracts: A Quantum Machine Learning Approach.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current research aims to discover applications of QML approaches in realizing liabilities within smart contracts. These contracts are essential commodities of the blockchain interface and are also decisive in developing decentralized products. But liabilities in smart contracts could result in unfamiliar system failures. Presently, static detection tools are utilized to discover accountabilities. However, they could result in instances of false narratives due to their dependency on predefined rules. In addition, these policies can often be superseded, failing to generalize on new contracts. The detection of liabilities with ML approaches, correspondingly, has certain limitations with contract size due to storage and performance issues. Nevertheless, employing QML approaches could be beneficial as they do not necessitate any preconceived rules. They often learn from data attributes during the training process and are employed as alternatives to ML approaches in terms of storage and performance. The present study employs four QML approaches, namely, QNN, QSVM, VQC, and QRF, for discovering susceptibilities. Experimentation revealed that the QNN model surpasses other approaches in detecting liabilities, with a performance accuracy of 82.43%. To further validate its feasibility and performance, the model was assessed on a several-partition test dataset, i.e., SolidiFI data, and the outcomes remained consistent. Additionally, the performance of the model was statistically validated using McNemar's test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.