Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41008059›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Ascertaining Susceptibilities in Smart Contracts: A Quantum Machine Learning Approach.

Amulyashree Sridhar, Kalyan Nagaraj, Shambhavi Bangalore Ravi, Sindhu Kurup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amulyashree SridharDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Bengaluru Campus, Bengaluru 560035, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3902-7740
Kalyan NagarajDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science), B.M.S. College of Engineering, Basavanagudi, Bangalore 560019, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6495-3132
Shambhavi Bangalore RaviDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science), B.M.S. College of Engineering, Basavanagudi, Bangalore 560019, Karnataka, India.
Sindhu KurupDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science), B.M.S. College of Engineering, Basavanagudi, Bangalore 560019, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8457-6642

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current research aims to discover applications of QML approaches in realizing liabilities within smart contracts. These contracts are essential commodities of the blockchain interface and are also decisive in developing decentralized products. But liabilities in smart contracts could result in unfamiliar system failures. Presently, static detection tools are utilized to discover accountabilities. However, they could result in instances of false narratives due to their dependency on predefined rules. In addition, these policies can often be superseded, failing to generalize on new contracts. The detection of liabilities with ML approaches, correspondingly, has certain limitations with contract size due to storage and performance issues. Nevertheless, employing QML approaches could be beneficial as they do not necessitate any preconceived rules. They often learn from data attributes during the training process and are employed as alternatives to ML approaches in terms of storage and performance. The present study employs four QML approaches, namely, QNN, QSVM, VQC, and QRF, for discovering susceptibilities. Experimentation revealed that the QNN model surpasses other approaches in detecting liabilities, with a performance accuracy of 82.43%. To further validate its feasibility and performance, the model was assessed on a several-partition test dataset, i.e., SolidiFI data, and the outcomes remained consistent. Additionally, the performance of the model was statistically validated using McNemar's test.

Indexed as

liabilitiesMcNemar’s TestQMLQNNsmart contracts

Identifiers

PMID41008059
PMCPMC12468476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.