Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41008017›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Entropy, Fidelity, and Entanglement During Digitized Adiabatic Quantum Computing to Form a Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) State.

Nathan D Jansen, Katharine L C Hunt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nathan D JansenDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8839-3643
Katharine L C HuntDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

Funding

U.S. National Science Foundation CHE-2154028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyzed the accuracy of digitized adiabatic quantum computing to form the entangled three-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state on two IBM quantum computers and four quantum simulators by comparison with direct calculations using a Python code (version 3.12). We initialized three-qubit systems in the ground state of the Hamiltonian for noninteracting spins in an applied magnetic field in the x direction. We then gradually varied the Hamiltonian to an Ising model form with nearest-neighbor zz spin coupling with an eight-step discretization. The von Neumann entropy provides an indicator of the accuracy of the discretized adiabatic evolution. The von Neumann entropy of the density matrix from the Python code remains very close to zero, while the von Neumann entropy of the density matrices on the quantum computers increases almost linearly with the step number in the process. The GHZ witness operator indicates that the quantum simulators incorporate a GHZ component in part. The states on the two quantum computers acquire partial GHZ character, even though the trace of the product of the GHZ witness operator with the density matrix not only remains positive but also rises monotonically from Step 5 to Step 8. Each of the qubits becomes entangled during the adiabatic evolution in all of the calculations, as shown by the single-qubit reduced density matrices.

Indexed as

adiabatic theoremdensity matricesdigitized adiabatic quantum computingentanglementGHZ statevon Neumann entropywitness operator

Identifiers

PMID41008017
PMCPMC12468138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.