ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Antimicrobial Resistance and Residues from Biofilms in Poultry, Swine, and Cattle Farms: A Scoping Review.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Environmental Biofilms in Livestock Production Systems: Reservoirs of Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Presence of antimicrobial resistance genes in biofilms from swine drinking water pipes before and after treatment with peracetic acid.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of antibiotics in livestock has contributed to the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and biofilms can play a role in its emergence and dissemination. This review aimed to map the literature on AMR, antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), and antibiotic residues (ARs) in biofilms from drinking water distribution systems in poultry, swine, and cattle farms.
methodsThe review was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR extension. Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Agricola, and Web of Science) were searched. Studies were screened in Rayyan.
resultsThe search yielded 1242 studies. After screening 732 studies, only 4 met the inclusion criteria. These studies focused on poultry (n = 3) and dairy cattle (n = 1), not on swine. Isolation relied on plating methods. Two studies complemented culturing with 16S rRNA sequencing. No studies applied culture-independent techniques. The number of biofilm-derived isolates across studies ranges from 6 to 102. Three studies performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing, using a wide range of antibiotics (16 to 31). One study analyzed ARGs; none quantified ARs.
conclusionsThe limited number of studies and lack of standardized methods hinder the generalizability of the findings, underscoring the need for research to clarify biofilms' role in AMR dissemination in livestock farms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.