Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007975›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Fuzzy Logic-Based Decision Support for Dairy Cattle Welfare Integrating Different Benchmarks.

Sándor Gáspár, László Pataki, Ákos Barta, Gergő Thalmeiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sándor GáspárDepartment of Investment, Finance and Accounting, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly Str. 1, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
László PatakiDoctoral School of Management and Business Administration, John von Neumann University, Infopark sétány 1, HU-1117 Budapest, Hungary.
Ákos BartaDoctoral School of Economics and Regional Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly Str. 1, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.
Gergő ThalmeinerDepartment of Investment, Finance and Accounting, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly Str. 1, H-2100 Gödöllő, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-7224-1028

Funding

Ministry for Culture and Innovation EKÖP-MATE/2024/25/K
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, one of the key areas of sustainable agriculture is increasing animal welfare. However, in the absence of generally accepted measurement criteria and systems, measuring animal welfare can be considered a subjective area that makes measuring animal welfare complex. As a result, both increasing welfare and making intervention decisions are not clear for farm management. In our research, we develop a fuzzy logic-based decision support system that is able to handle the subjectivity arising from determining animal welfare. During focus group interviews, experts pointed out that animal welfare assessment systems do not provide adequate support in decision-making. However, the integration of different benchmarks (past, best values and competitors) and the triangular membership functions assigned to them in the assessment significantly supports decision-making. The models were tested with data collected with the Welfare Quality Assessment System of three dairy farms (Austrian, Hungarian, and Slovak). In our result the models show different assessment results; therefore, an aggregate assessment model was created by aggregating the results of the models. The aggregate model incorporates the value judgments and importance of the different models by applying the Choquet integral, thereby providing a more accurate assessment according to the criteria that meet the expectations of decision-makers. Our research shows that animal welfare assessment systems should be based on fuzzy logic and the application of multi-criteria benchmarks until standards reduce the uncertainty in measuring animal welfare levels.

Indexed as

aggregate indexanimal welfareevaluation systemfuzzy logicwelfare quality

Identifiers

PMID41007975
PMCPMC12466726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.