ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Fuzzy Logic-Based Decision Support for Dairy Cattle Welfare Integrating Different Benchmarks.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nowadays, one of the key areas of sustainable agriculture is increasing animal welfare. However, in the absence of generally accepted measurement criteria and systems, measuring animal welfare can be considered a subjective area that makes measuring animal welfare complex. As a result, both increasing welfare and making intervention decisions are not clear for farm management. In our research, we develop a fuzzy logic-based decision support system that is able to handle the subjectivity arising from determining animal welfare. During focus group interviews, experts pointed out that animal welfare assessment systems do not provide adequate support in decision-making. However, the integration of different benchmarks (past, best values and competitors) and the triangular membership functions assigned to them in the assessment significantly supports decision-making. The models were tested with data collected with the Welfare Quality Assessment System of three dairy farms (Austrian, Hungarian, and Slovak). In our result the models show different assessment results; therefore, an aggregate assessment model was created by aggregating the results of the models. The aggregate model incorporates the value judgments and importance of the different models by applying the Choquet integral, thereby providing a more accurate assessment according to the criteria that meet the expectations of decision-makers. Our research shows that animal welfare assessment systems should be based on fuzzy logic and the application of multi-criteria benchmarks until standards reduce the uncertainty in measuring animal welfare levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.