ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
State-of-the-Art Age Determination Methods for Amphibians and Reptiles.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Guess Who: Delineating Post-Metamorphic Amphibian Life Stages and Sexes Using a Standardised Visible Approach.Journal of morphology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we provide an overview of the age determination methods of amphibians and reptiles, critically evaluating their methodological principles, utility (including range of applicability), as well as experimental and biological limitations. Potentially, the most reliable age estimation method is the capture-mark-recapture (CMR) technique, allowing a precise chronological age estimation of wild individuals. However, this is a time-consuming method and is not always applicable. Among the indirect methods of age estimation, skeletochronology is one of the most reliable techniques and has been successfully applied in numerous species of amphibians and reptiles. Skeletochronology is based on the interpretation of the growth marks (especially lines of arrested growth or LAGs) that form in hard-mineralized tissues. Other indirect methods such as the counting of growth marks on epidermal scutes, dermal scales, and claw sections have shown to be less reliable and/or have a more limited range of applicability. Recently, the estimation of chronological age using molecular methods has acquired new perspectives from different approaches. Among them, measurements of telomere length and DNA methylation represent promising and minimally invasive methods, but their effective use requires further refinement and testing on a larger number of species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.