Isolation of

Alexandre S Borges, Luiza S Zakia, Serena Yu, Michael G Surette, Luis G Arroyo

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandre S BorgesDepartments of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Luiza S ZakiaDepartments of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Serena YuDepartments of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.

Michael G SuretteDepartment of Medicine, Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.

Luis G ArroyoDepartments of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6007-5413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In veterinary hospitals, the risk of

methodsThe environment of the large animal clinic of a university veterinary hospital was tested for the presence of

resultsThirteen isolates were recovered from 157 (8.3%) of multiple sampled sites of the main hospital. Ten distinct ribotypes, of which 7 were positive for toxin genes A and B, and all were negative for binary toxin genes. The two most common PCR ribotypes were 014 and 010. Isolates belong to the MLST Clade 1 and were further divided into 5 different sequence types. A high prevalence of AMR genes was observed in some isolates.

conclusions

Indexed as

anaerobicequinenosocomialspore

Identifiers

PMID41007948

DOI10.3390/ani15182703

PMCPMC12466365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.