ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Heterogeneity of Variances in Milk Yield in Murrah Buffaloes.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the presence of heterogeneity of variance in milk yield in the first lactation of buffaloes and its subsequent influence on the genetic evaluation of Murrah breed sires. The analysis utilized a dataset comprising 2392 milk yield records of buffaloes involved in the Programa de Melhoramento de Búfalos do Brasil. The standard deviation classes were established by standardizing the averages of contemporary group levels, with positive values constituting the high standard deviation class and values equaling or less than zero comprising the low standard deviation class. The linear mixed model incorporated fixed effects of sire group, buffalo age at calving, and heterozygosity as covariates, along with additive genetic random effects. Variance components were estimated via Bayesian inference employing the Gibbs sampler to derive posterior means. The average posterior heritability obtained in analyses without considering heterogeneity of variances (i.e., the "general analysis") was 0.21, while the averages 0.19 and 0.34 were obtained for the low and high standard deviation classes, respectively. The genetic correlation between standard deviation classes was 0.61. The genetic correlation estimates between the predictions of breeding values for milk yield were more closely aligned between the predictions obtained in the general analysis with the low standard deviation class, and more discrepant between the two standard deviation classes. In the animal genetic evaluation model, when heterogeneity of variance is disregarded, the variance components are substantially weighted towards the performance of individuals in the low phenotypic variability class. By disregarding the presence and heterogeneity of variance, the breeding values of the best sires were underestimated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.