ReviewBiomedicines2025
Potential for Therapeutic Alteration of the Underlying Biology of Epilepsy.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trial
- Targeting the Complement-Microglia Axis for Neuroprotection in Pediatric Epilepsy.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Approximately 30-35% of people with epilepsy experience seizures despite taking antiseizure medications. Recurrent seizures that are independent of status epilepticus can be associated with neuronal injury and structural changes to the brain, as well as diminished cognitive function, mood, and quality of life. A treatment that alters the underlying biology of epilepsy, thereby reducing the seizure burden and its attendant consequences, would be of great value in preventing these detrimental effects. In this review, we summarize preclinical and clinical research on pharmacological treatments that may favorably alter the underlying biology of epilepsy (i.e., disease modification or antiepileptogenesis). A reduction in seizures over time (e.g., increase in responder rates) or prevention of epilepsy in susceptible individuals has been observed with therapies that target neurotransmission (cenobamate, cannabidiol, vigabatrin, and diazepam nasal spray) and inflammation (everolimus), though evidence is limited and in preliminary stages. Pharmacological treatments that target neuroinflammation and oxidative stress have the potential to modify seizure phenotype and 1 or more comorbidities in preclinical studies (e.g., stress/anxiety and depression). Gene therapies and stem-cell-derived treatments also hold promise in reducing seizure burden in preclinical models, with several therapeutic candidates having advanced to phase 1/2 and 3 clinical trials. Effective disease-modifying strategies in epilepsy might include seizure control with novel antiseizure medications in combination with therapeutic targeting of key pathophysiological mechanisms. Standard criteria and a definition of disease modification should be established. Importantly, given the heterogeneity of the epilepsies, syndrome- or seizure-specific methods and trial design would likely be required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.