ReviewBiomedicines2025
What Is New in Spinal Cord Injury Management: A Narrative Review on the Emerging Role of Nanotechnology.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Evolution and Frontiers in Glial Scar and Spinal Cord Injury Research: A Bibliometric Perspective.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Next-generation biomedical nanorobots: active design, intelligent control, and translational opportunities in regenerative and minimally invasive medicine.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Nanotube-Assisted Motor Neuron and Neuromuscular Junction Stabilization in Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Hypothesis for Adjunctive Therapy.Neurology international · 2026Review
- Current Advancements in the Arsenal for Spinal Cord Injury Repair: Novel Drug Formulations.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic injuries to the brain and spinal cord remain among the most challenging conditions in clinical neuroscience due to the complexity of repair mechanisms and the limited regenerative capacity of neural tissues. Nanotechnology has emerged as a transformative field, offering precise diagnostic tools, targeted therapeutic delivery systems, and advanced scaffolding platforms that are capable of overcoming the biological barriers to regeneration. This review summarizes the recent advances in nanoscale diagnostic markers, functionalized nanoparticles for drug delivery, and nanostructured scaffolds designed to modulate the injured microenvironment and support axonal regrowth and remyelination. Emerging evidence indicates that nanotechnology enables real-time, minimally invasive detection of inflammation, oxidative stress, and cellular damage, while improving therapeutic efficacy and reducing systemic side effects through targeted delivery. Electroconductive scaffolds and hybrid strategies that integrate electrical stimulation, gene therapy, and artificial intelligence further expand opportunities for personalized neuroregeneration. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain, including long-term safety, immune compatibility, the scalability of large-scale production, and translational barriers, such as small sample sizes, heterogeneous preclinical models, and limited follow-up in existing studies. Addressing these issues will be critical to realize the full potential of nanotechnology in traumatic brain and spinal cord injury and to accelerate the transition from promising preclinical findings to effective clinical therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.