ReviewBiomedicines2025
Nucleic Acid Diversity in cGAS-STING Pathway Activation and Immune Dysregulation.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune response to DNA and RNA: structural insights, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic targeting.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Multi-Omics-Guided Design and Safety Engineering of Nucleic Acid Therapeutics: From Molecular Perturbation to Predictive Toxicology and Precision Translation.Chemical biology & drug design · 2026Review
- Review
- Senescent cells in systemic aging: SASP heterogeneity, immune escape, and endocrine modulation.Biogerontology · 2026Review
- Inducing tumor-intrinsic innate immune response to break cancer immunotherapy resistance.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Microbiota-innate immune crosstalk drives atherosclerosis: mechanisms, disease progression, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota-immune crosstalk in osteoarthritis: pathogenic mechanisms and emerging therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cGAS-STING pathway initiates the core cascade of innate immune defense by recognizing pathogen-associated and self-derived abnormal nucleic acids, and key molecules (such as cGAS, STING, downstream IFN-β, IL-6, etc.) may serve as biomarkers in various diseases. The diverse mechanisms by which distinct nucleic acids activate this pathway provide novel insights for therapeutic strategies targeting infectious diseases, cancer, and autoimmune disorders. To prevent aberrant cGAS-STING pathway activation, cells employ multiple regulatory mechanisms, including restricting self-DNA recognition and terminating downstream signaling. Strategies to mitigate pathological activation involve reducing nucleic acid accumulation through nuclease degradation (e.g., of mitochondrial DNA or neutrophil extracellular traps, NETs) or directly inhibiting cGAS or STING. This review elucidates the molecular mechanism of nucleic acid-mediated regulation of cGAS-STING and its role in disease regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.