ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Development and Validity Evaluation of the Index of Social Work Process in Promoting Social Participation of Welfare Recipients (SWP-PSP) in Japan.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social workers are required to have the capacity to effectively support welfare recipients to restore their labor participation for social inclusion. However, a systematic method for process evaluation of this capacity has not yet been established. In this study, we developed the Index of Social Work Process in Promoting Social Participation of Welfare Recipients (SWP-PSP) to address this gap. Item domains and pools were prepared by referring to existing social work guidelines and human capital management theories, and content and face validity were confirmed by an expert panel review. The initial 75 items were revised to 44. We conducted a cross-sectional survey with 139 social workers working in public livelihood support at various municipal authorities in Japan. Item response theory analysis was performed for item selection, followed by the criterion-related validity test for convergent validation using Utrecht Work Engagement (UWE) scale scores as a reference. The selected 20 items with four domains were moderately correlated with UWE scores (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.35). Certified social workers demonstrated a stronger correlation with UWE (r = 0.44) than social workers without certification (r = 0.26). Cronbach's alpha coefficients in each domain were over 0.77. These results indicate the reliability and validity of the SWP-PSP. This measure may be helpful for the evaluation of social workers' capacity to promote social inclusion of welfare recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.