Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007574›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Digital Health Technologies for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence, Access Inequities, and Public Health Integration.

Tatiana Cristina Dias de Oliveira, Alana Ferreira de Oliveira, Laila de Castro Araújo, Maria Pantoja Moreira de Sena, Valéria de Castro Fagundes, Phelipe Augusto Rabelo Paixão, Stefani Gisele Bastos Dornas, Clarisse Andrade Sales, Ana Paula Simões Castro, Patricia Alves de Mendonça Cavalcante and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tatiana Cristina Dias de OliveiraGraduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil.
Alana Ferreira de OliveiraGraduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil.
Laila de Castro AraújoGraduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil.
Maria Pantoja Moreira de SenaPostgraduate Program in Tropical Diseases, Federal University of Pará, Belem 66075-110, Brazil.
Valéria de Castro FagundesFaculty of Medical Sciences of Pará, Para 38405-320, Brazil.
Phelipe Augusto Rabelo PaixãoGraduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil.
Stefani Gisele Bastos DornasGraduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil.
Clarisse Andrade SalesPostgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil.
Ana Paula Simões CastroPostgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil.
Patricia Alves de Mendonça CavalcantePostgraduate Program in Biodiversity and Biotechnology, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil.
Luann Wendel Pereira de SenaGraduate Program in Family Health, Federal University of the South and Southeast of Pará, Maraba 68507-590, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9363-5766

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers are among the most severe complications of diabetes mellitus, disproportionately affecting populations in low- and middle-income countries. Digital health technologies have emerged as promising tools for prevention, diagnosis, and management; however, their effectiveness, usability, and applicability within public health systems remain insufficiently defined. This systematic review aimed to critically synthesize the clinical effectiveness, perceived usability, and methodological quality of digital interventions for the care of individuals with diabetes-related foot ulcers. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2012 and 2024. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing mobile health applications, wearable sensor devices, artificial intelligence-based tools, and telehealth platforms. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Artificial intelligence-driven approaches demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity and specificity above 90% for ulcer detection and classification. Mobile applications showed positive effects on self-efficacy, glycemic control, and adherence to preventive foot care, while usability scores were consistently high. Wearable sensor devices demonstrated potential for reducing ulcer recurrence, though supporting evidence remains limited. Across studies, recurrent methodological limitations included small sample sizes, absence of control groups, lack of economic evaluations, and barriers related to digital literacy and interoperability between systems. Most investigations were conducted in high-income countries, with limited consideration of public health contexts such as the Brazilian Unified Health System. In conclusion, digital health technologies show promise in improving the care of individuals with diabetes-related foot complications but face significant challenges regarding scalability, equity of access, and integration into public healthcare systems. Future research should prioritize context-adapted designs, robust clinical trials, and economic evaluations to inform health policies and support the rational adoption of these tools within universal health coverage frameworks. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251023152.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootDigital TechnologyPublic HealthTelemedicineArtificial IntelligenceDigital HealthHumansMobile ApplicationsWearable Electronic Devicesdiabetic footdigital healthhealth technologymobile health applications

Identifiers

PMID41007574
PMCPMC12469766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.