SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Digital Health Technologies for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence, Access Inequities, and Public Health Integration.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multisite Implementation of a Digital Wound Model of Care: A Post-Implementation Multimethods Evaluation of Patient and Clinician Perspectives and Lessons Learned.International wound journal · 2026Article
- User-Centered Development of a Digital Health Service for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Risk Stratification: Usability Study.JMIR diabetes · 2026Article
- Digital Health and Community-Based Care for Diabetic Foot Prevention and Management in Resource-Limited Settings: A Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Beyond clinical closure: functional skin barrier recovery to prevent diabetic foot ulcer recurrence: a narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- The relationship between digital health literacy, self-efficacy, and self-management behaviors in patients with diabetes-related foot disease: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Clinical applications of machine learning for infection assessment in diabetic foot ulcers.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Feasibility study of a smartphone app to monitor systemic sclerosis-related digital ulcers-a potential new tool for remote clinical monitoring.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers are among the most severe complications of diabetes mellitus, disproportionately affecting populations in low- and middle-income countries. Digital health technologies have emerged as promising tools for prevention, diagnosis, and management; however, their effectiveness, usability, and applicability within public health systems remain insufficiently defined. This systematic review aimed to critically synthesize the clinical effectiveness, perceived usability, and methodological quality of digital interventions for the care of individuals with diabetes-related foot ulcers. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies published between 2012 and 2024. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing mobile health applications, wearable sensor devices, artificial intelligence-based tools, and telehealth platforms. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Artificial intelligence-driven approaches demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity and specificity above 90% for ulcer detection and classification. Mobile applications showed positive effects on self-efficacy, glycemic control, and adherence to preventive foot care, while usability scores were consistently high. Wearable sensor devices demonstrated potential for reducing ulcer recurrence, though supporting evidence remains limited. Across studies, recurrent methodological limitations included small sample sizes, absence of control groups, lack of economic evaluations, and barriers related to digital literacy and interoperability between systems. Most investigations were conducted in high-income countries, with limited consideration of public health contexts such as the Brazilian Unified Health System. In conclusion, digital health technologies show promise in improving the care of individuals with diabetes-related foot complications but face significant challenges regarding scalability, equity of access, and integration into public healthcare systems. Future research should prioritize context-adapted designs, robust clinical trials, and economic evaluations to inform health policies and support the rational adoption of these tools within universal health coverage frameworks. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420251023152.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.