Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007570›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Thriving from Work Questionnaire: Validation of a Measure of Worker Wellbeing Among Older U.S. Workers.

Maren Wright Voss, Cal J Halvorsen, Kanchan Yadav, Stephanie M Neidlinger, Gregory R Wagner, Susan E Peters

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maren Wright VossDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9054-7389
Cal J HalvorsenCenter for Work, Health, and Wellbeing, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9184-633X
Kanchan YadavDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Stephanie M NeidlingerDepartment of Work, Organizational, and Business Psychology, Helmut-Schmidt University, 22043 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4468-3347
Gregory R WagnerDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Susan E PetersDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2705-643X

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS 2 U19 OH008861-15NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008416NIOSH CDC HHS U19 OH008861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As life expectancy and retirement ages rise globally, understanding how older workers thrive in the workplace is an increasingly vital measurement and wellbeing priority. In this study, we validated the Thriving from Work Questionnaire (TfWQ) for workers aged ≥50. A U.S. online panel yielded 617 older workers and 372 younger counterparts for comparison. Using item response theory alongside model-fit evaluation and correlational tests with job/life satisfaction, engagement, burnout, and turnover intent-we assessed reliability and construct validity of the long- (30 reduced to 29-item) and short- (8-item) form TfWQ versions. We recommend omitting one of the original items from the long-form for use in older workers. Instrument reliability was high (α = 0.94 long-form; 0.90 short-form). Model fit was established for both long- and short-form versions with acceptable model fit indices. Convergent validity was supported by strong, theory-consistent correlations with the external constructs. Older workers, compared with those 20-49 years, had higher scores of thriving from work as well as differences identified on nine items. These age-patterned differences highlight actionable levers for occupational-health age-sensitive policy, wellbeing interventions, and workforce planning. The TfWQ offers a robust, reliable, valid, and practically oriented tool for evaluating older workers' wellbeing with utility across research, practice, and policy.

Indexed as

Job SatisfactionWorkplaceAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adultitem response theoryjob satisfactionoccupational healthoccupational stresspsychological safetypsychological well-beingpsychometricsworking conditionswork-life balancework-related wellbeing

Identifiers

PMID41007570
PMCPMC12469839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.