ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Exploring Women's Perceived Quality of Antenatal Care: A Cross-Sectional Study in The Netherlands.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluating antenatal care quality involves understanding women's experiences and their impact on pregnancy outcomes. This study examines how pregnant women in the Netherlands perceive the quality of antenatal care and which factors are related to these perceptions, with a focus on continuity of care. We conducted a cross-sectional study (2019-2020) among 1165 pregnant women (>32 weeks). Perceived quality of care was measured using the Pregnancy and Childbirth Questionnaire. Experienced continuity of care was measured using the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire. Regression analyses explored associated factors across both community and hospital care settings. Most women reported moderate-to-high levels of perceived quality. Personal continuity from community midwives, team continuity, and the presence of a coordinating care professional were associated with higher perceived quality. The use of a maternity care plan showed no association. Our findings suggest that involvement of a community midwife enhances perceived quality of antenatal care. Key contributing factors include continuity of care and experiencing a coordinating care professional.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.