Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007526›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Sustainability of AI-Assisted Mental Health Intervention: A Review of the Literature from 2020-2025.

Danicsa Karina Espino Carrasco, María Del Rosario Palomino Alcántara, Carmen Graciela Arbulú Pérez Vargas, Briseidy Massiel Santa Cruz Espino, Luis Jhonny Dávila Valdera, Cindy Vargas Cabrera, Madeleine Espino Carrasco, Anny Dávila Valdera, Luz Mirella Agurto Córdova

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Danicsa Karina Espino CarrascoSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad César Vallejo, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.
María Del Rosario Palomino AlcántaraSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Particular de Chiclayo, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.
Carmen Graciela Arbulú Pérez VargasSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad César Vallejo, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.
Briseidy Massiel Santa Cruz EspinoSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.
Luis Jhonny Dávila ValderaSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 00051, Peru.
Cindy Vargas CabreraSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Señor de Sipán, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.
Madeleine Espino CarrascoSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad César Vallejo, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.
Anny Dávila ValderaSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 00051, Peru.
Luz Mirella Agurto CórdovaSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad César Vallejo, Chiclayo 14000, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review examines the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the development of sustainable mental health interventions through a comprehensive analysis of literature published between 2020 and 2025. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, 62 studies were selected from 1652 initially identified records across four major databases. The results revealed four dimensions critical for sustainability: ethical considerations (privacy, informed consent, bias, and human oversight), personalization approaches (federated learning and AI-enhanced therapeutic interventions), risk mitigation strategies (data security, algorithmic bias, and clinical efficacy), and implementation challenges (technical infrastructure, cultural adaptation, and resource allocation). The findings demonstrate that long-term sustainability depends on ethics-driven approaches, resource-efficient techniques such as federated learning, culturally adaptive systems, and appropriate human-AI integration. The study concludes that sustainable mental health AI requires addressing both technical efficacy and ethical integrity while ensuring equitable access across diverse contexts. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies examining the long-term effectiveness and cultural adaptability of AI interventions in resource-limited settings.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesHumansartificial intelligencecultural adaptationethicshuman-AI integrationpersonalizationresource efficiencysustainable mental health

Identifiers

PMID41007526
PMCPMC12469610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.