Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007525›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

The SRAQ-HP: Development and Initial Validation of a Tool to Assess Perceived Resource Adequacy Among Healthcare Professionals.

Olga Cerela-Boltunova, Inga Millere, Ingrida Trups-Kalne

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Olga Cerela-BoltunovaDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-2005
Inga MillereDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.
Ingrida Trups-KalneInstitute of Public Health, Psychology Laboratory, Riga Stradiņš University, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia.

Funding

Riga Stradiņš University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare systems worldwide face growing challenges related to staff shortages, excessive workload, and deteriorating working conditions, which compromise both staff well-being and care quality. Despite these issues, there is a lack of validated tools that capture healthcare professionals' subjective perceptions of resource adequacy. This study presents the development and initial validation of the Staff Resource Adequacy Questionnaire for Healthcare Professionals (SRAQ-HP), a multidimensional tool designed to assess staffing adequacy and workload, quality of care, and working conditions and support. The development process followed a mixed-methods design, incorporating theoretical foundations from Kanter's empowerment theory, role enactment models, and professional competence frameworks. The initial item pool of 32 statements was reduced to 26 through expert reviews, focus groups, and pilot testing (

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkloadhealth personnelLatviaorganisational supportperceived workloadpersonnel staffing and schedulingquality of health carestaffing adequacy

Identifiers

PMID41007525
PMCPMC12470216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.