ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
A Novel Macro-Level Model in Evaluating Health and Safety Training Based on Virtual Reality.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This document proposes a new evaluation model to be applied to a training course on health and safety at work based on virtual reality. The model refers to three macro-levels (design, delivery, and evaluation), which extend throughout the training life cycle. At macro level 1, design, the quality of the model intended for the virtual reality experience is evaluated, as well as its adaptation to the work environment and its compliance with applicable voluntary and mandatory standards; in macro level 2, delivery, the performance of the model, the individual reactions of users with headsets, their performance and psycho-physical state, the time, and the score achieved are evaluated; in macro level 3, evaluation, the long-term effects of subjective training and the social and economic impact that virtual reality training has had on the organisation are evaluated. The study investigates assessment models for virtual-reality-based occupational health and safety courses and identifies a model outlining general criteria that can be adapted to several types of courses and different work sectors. By examining the typical stages of the training life cycle and drawing on training evaluation models such as Kirkpatrick or Molenda and Information and Communication Technology metrics, the study identifies the key elements for assessing the effectiveness of virtual reality training in occupational health and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.