Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007461›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Reliability of the Feeling Scale and Felt Arousal Scale in Older Adults.

Victor Grillo Sobrinho, Walace Monteiro, Carlos Alberto Aiello Ribeiro, Mauro Lúcio Mazini Filho, Rodrigo Gomes de Souza Vale, Nádia Souza Lima da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victor Grillo SobrinhoGraduate Program in Exercise and Sport Science, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 20550-900, Brazil.
Walace MonteiroGraduate Program in Exercise and Sport Science, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 20550-900, Brazil.
Carlos Alberto Aiello RibeiroGraduate Program in Exercise and Sport Science, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 20550-900, Brazil.
Mauro Lúcio Mazini FilhoFederal Institute of Education, Science and Technology, Cataguases Campus, Cataguases 36773-563, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3895-6107
Rodrigo Gomes de Souza ValeGraduate Program in Exercise and Sport Science, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 20550-900, Brazil.
Nádia Souza Lima da SilvaGraduate Program in Exercise and Sport Science, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 20550-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0617-0521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective responses to physical exercise vary according to sensory impressions and can influence motor performance. To assess affective states in exercise contexts, scales such as the Felt Arousal Scale and the Feeling Scale are commonly used. Although widely applied, their psychometric properties have not yet been tested in older adults, which limits their use in this population. This test-retest study aimed to test the reliability of these scales in older adults of both sexes. The sample consisted of 80 volunteers (67 women) engaged in either resistance training (

Indexed as

ArousalEmotionsExerciseAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsResistance Trainingaffectaffective trainingagingfelt arousal

Identifiers

PMID41007461
PMCPMC12469608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.