ArticleBiology2025
Provenance-Specific Height-Diameter Modeling for Chinese Fir: A Clustered Mixed-Effects Approach.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chinese fir is the predominant afforestation species in southern China, exhibiting distinct provenances due to long-term climatic adaptation. This study utilized data from four surveys conducted at different ages in a provenance trial forest at Zhangping Wuyi Forest Farm, Fujian Province, to classify Chinese fir provenances using cluster analysis based on growth metrics. The resulting clusters were integrated as random effects into height-diameter models. Model performance was enhanced by incorporating age parameters and validated through five-fold cross-validation. The findings reveal that: (1) the Logistic model best captured the fundamental height-diameter relationship of Chinese fir; (2) the inclusion of provenance-clustering random effects improved model fit and predictive accuracy, with height-based clustering outperforming other methods; (3) the addition of age parameters further refined the base models beyond the clustering effects, and the combination of both approaches achieved the highest precision. Among clustering techniques, height-based clustering surpassed combined height-diameter at breast height (DBH) clustering, while DBH-based clustering was the least effective. The developed models facilitate precise growth predictions for multi-provenance Chinese fir across extensive geographic ranges, offering a theoretical basis for provenance-specific management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.