ArticleBiology2025
A Transformer-Based Deep Diffusion Model for Bulk RNA-Seq Deconvolution.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DeOPUS: cellular deconvolution via optimized power-transformed unmixing with shrinkage.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBulk RNA-seq is a cost-effective method for measuring average gene expression in tissue samples, but its lack of single-cell resolution limits the understanding of cellular heterogeneity. Computational deconvolution aims to infer cell-type proportions from bulk RNA-seq data; however, the accuracy of existing methods needs improvement, especially in complex tissues.
methodsIn this study, we introduce DiffFormer, a novel deconvolution model that, for the first time, integrates a conditional diffusion model with a Transformer architecture. We systematically evaluated DiffFormer on four pseudo-bulk datasets and validated it on a gold-standard real-world dataset with FACS-based ground truth.
resultsDiffFormer demonstrated consistent and strong performance across all test datasets, outperforming existing methods and a baseline MLP-based diffusion model (DiffMLP). For instance, on the pbmc3k dataset, DiffFormer reduced the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) from 0.1060 to 0.0120 compared to DiffMLP. This advantage was further confirmed on the real-world dataset, where DiffFormer achieved the highest Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC).
conclusionsThis work provides a high-precision, reproducible tool for cellular deconvolution. Crucially, the direct comparison with an MLP-based diffusion model provides definitive evidence that the Transformer architecture is key to its success, highlighting the potential of such models for solving complex bioinformatics problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.