ReviewBiology2025
Biological Sequence Representation Methods and Recent Advances: A Review.
Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Generative artificial intelligence in animal genomics for smart agriculture: Applications, challenges, and future prospects.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial Peptides Against Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria: Focus on Machine Learning.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological-sequence representation methods are pivotal for advancing machine learning in computational biology, transforming nucleotide and protein sequences into formats that enhance predictive modeling and downstream task performance. This review categorizes these methods into three developmental stages: computational-based, word embedding-based, and large language model (LLM)-based, detailing their principles, applications, and limitations. Computational-based methods, such as k-mer counting and position-specific scoring matrices (PSSM), extract statistical and evolutionary patterns to support tasks like motif discovery and protein-protein interaction prediction. Word embedding-based approaches, including Word2Vec and GloVe, capture contextual relationships, enabling robust sequence classification and regulatory element identification. Advanced LLM-based methods, leveraging Transformer architectures like ESM3 and RNAErnie, model long-range dependencies for RNA structure prediction and cross-modal analysis, achieving superior accuracy. However, challenges persist, including computational complexity, sensitivity to data quality, and limited interpretability of high-dimensional embeddings. Future directions prioritize integrating multimodal data (e.g., sequences, structures, and functional annotations), employing sparse attention mechanisms to enhance efficiency, and leveraging explainable AI to bridge embeddings with biological insights. These advancements promise transformative applications in drug discovery, disease prediction, and genomics, empowering computational biology with robust, interpretable tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.