Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007249›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Evaluation of Operator Variability and Validation of an AI-Assisted α-Angle Measurement System for DDH Using a Phantom Model.

Yusuke Ohashi, Tomohiro Shimizu, Hidenori Koyano, Yumejiro Nakamura, Daisuke Takahashi, Katsuhisa Yamada, Norimasa Iwasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yusuke OhashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
Tomohiro ShimizuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6760-3066
Hidenori KoyanoDepartment of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
Yumejiro NakamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
Daisuke TakahashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
Katsuhisa YamadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9841-5890
Norimasa IwasakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5496-4046

Funding

AMED 25ym0126801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound examination using the Graf method is widely applied for early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), but intra- and inter-operator variability remains a limitation. This study aimed to quantify operator variability in hip ultrasound assessments and to validate an AI-assisted system for automated α-angle measurement to improve reproducibility. Thirty participants of different experience levels, including trained clinicians, residents, and medical students, each performed six ultrasound scans on a standardized infant hip phantom. Examination time, iliac margin inclination, and α-angle measurements were analyzed to assess intra- and inter-operator variability. In parallel, an AI-based system was developed to automatically detect anatomical landmarks and calculate α-angles from static images and dynamic video sequences. Validation was conducted using the phantom model with a known α-angle of 70°. Clinicians achieved shorter examination times and higher reproducibility than residents and students, with manual measurements systematically underestimating the reference α-angle. Static AI produced closer estimates with greater variability, whereas dynamic AI achieved the highest accuracy (mean 69.2°) and consistency with narrower limits of agreement than manual measurements. These findings confirm substantial operator variability and demonstrate that AI-assisted dynamic ultrasound analysis can improve reproducibility and reliability in routine DDH screening.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligence (AI)Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)operator variabilityultrasound imagingα-angle measurement

Identifiers

PMID41007249
PMCPMC12467695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.