ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluation of Operator Variability and Validation of an AI-Assisted α-Angle Measurement System for DDH Using a Phantom Model.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nurses' Challenges in Performing Ultrasound Hip-Screening Techniques for Home Visits to Newborns and Infants: A Descriptive Case Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound examination using the Graf method is widely applied for early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), but intra- and inter-operator variability remains a limitation. This study aimed to quantify operator variability in hip ultrasound assessments and to validate an AI-assisted system for automated α-angle measurement to improve reproducibility. Thirty participants of different experience levels, including trained clinicians, residents, and medical students, each performed six ultrasound scans on a standardized infant hip phantom. Examination time, iliac margin inclination, and α-angle measurements were analyzed to assess intra- and inter-operator variability. In parallel, an AI-based system was developed to automatically detect anatomical landmarks and calculate α-angles from static images and dynamic video sequences. Validation was conducted using the phantom model with a known α-angle of 70°. Clinicians achieved shorter examination times and higher reproducibility than residents and students, with manual measurements systematically underestimating the reference α-angle. Static AI produced closer estimates with greater variability, whereas dynamic AI achieved the highest accuracy (mean 69.2°) and consistency with narrower limits of agreement than manual measurements. These findings confirm substantial operator variability and demonstrate that AI-assisted dynamic ultrasound analysis can improve reproducibility and reliability in routine DDH screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.