ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Linking a Deep Learning Model for Concussion Classification with Reorganization of Large-Scale Brain Networks in Female Youth.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Concussion, or mild traumatic brain injury, is a significant public health challenge, with females experiencing high rates and prolonged symptoms. Reliable and objective tools for early diagnosis are critically needed, particularly in pediatric populations, where subjective symptom reporting can be inconsistent and neurodevelopmental factors may influence presentation. Five minutes of resting-state (RS) EEG data were collected from non-concussed and concussed females between 15 and 24 years of age. We first applied a deep learning approach to classify concussion directly from raw, RS electroencephalography (EEG) data. A long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network trained on the raw data achieved 84.2% accuracy and an ensemble median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.904. To complement these results, we examined causal connectivity at the source level using information flow rate to explore potential network-level changes associated with concussion. Effective connectivity in the non-concussed cohort was characterized by a symmetric pattern along the central-parietal midline; in contrast, the concussed group showed a more posterior and left-lateralized pattern. These spatial distribution changes were accompanied by significantly higher connection magnitudes in the concussed group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.