ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Two-Year Clinical Performance of Ultra-Thin No-Prep Veneers from 5Y-TZP Zirconia: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Partial Ceramic Veneers as a Conservative Restorative Strategy: A Narrative Review with Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis retrospective study aimed to evaluate the two-year clinical performance of ultra-thin, no-prep Prettau MATERIALS AND
methodsThis single-cohort retrospective series did not include a conventional control group. A total of 201 veneers (Prettau
resultsAt 24 months, no debonding events were recorded. The survival rate was 99.5% (95% CI: 97.3-99.9). Fracture rate was 0.5% (95% CI: 0.1-2.8). Most veneers received "very good" scores for surface luster (81.6%, 95% CI: 75.6-86.4), color match (96.0%, 95% CI: 92.0-98.0), marginal adaptation (84.1%, 95% CI: 78.3-88.6), and anatomical form (100%, 95% CI: 98.1-100). Periodontal response was rated as "very good" or "good" in 90.0% (95% CI: 85.4-93.4) of cases. Patient satisfaction remained consistently high (100%, 95% CI: 98.1-100).
conclusionsUltra-thin, no-prep Prettau
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.