ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Radiomics for Detecting Metaplastic Histology in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Step Towards Personalized Therapy.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subtype-specific sonographic signatures and clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast cancer: a 50-case cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Predicting Late-Onset Breast Cancer Metastasis: The Single-Hyperparameter Grid Search (SHGS) Strategy for Meta-Tuning a Deep Feed-Forward Neural Network.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to develop and validate a multisequence MRI-based radiomics approach for distinguishing metaplastic breast cancer (MBC) from non-metaplastic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at the initial diagnosis, which could facilitate optimal treatment selection. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 105 patients (27 MBC, 78 non-metaplastic TNBC) who underwent standardized breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which included T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1W-CE) and short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Two radiologists performed ground truth lesion segmentation, verified by a senior radiologist. We extracted 214 radiomic features (using PyRadiomics) and used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression for feature selection. Seven machine learning classifiers were thoroughly evaluated using five-fold cross-validation, with performance assessed through ROC analysis and accuracy metrics. The combined T1W-CE and STIR analysis demonstrated superior diagnostic performance for distinguishing MBC from non-metaplastic TNBC (AUC = 0.845; accuracy = 81%) compared with either sequence alone (T1W only AUC = 0.805; accuracy = 80%; STIR only AUC:0.768; accuracy = 77%). Multisequence MRI radiomics can reliably distinguish between MBC and TNBC at the time of initial diagnosis. This could potentially facilitate the selection of more appropriate treatments and help avoid ineffective chemotherapy for MBC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.