ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Cross-Instrument Data Utilization Based on Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) for the Identification of
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
New technologies and equipment for medicine analysis and diagnostics have always been critical in clinical medication and pharmaceutical production. Especially in the field of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) where the chemical composition is not fully clear, cross-device analysis and identification using the same technology can sometimes even lead to misjudgments. Akebia species, capable of inducing heat clearing, diuresis, and anti-inflammatory effects, show great potential in clinical applications. However, the three commonly used species differ in pharmacological effects and therefore should not be used interchangeably. We proposed a method combining LIBS with random forest for species identification and established a modeling and verification scheme across device platforms. Spectra of three Akebia species were collected using two LIBS systems equipped with spectrometers of different resolutions. The data acquired from the low-resolution spectrometer were used for model training, while the data from the high-resolution spectrometers were used for testing. A spectral correction and feature selection (SCFS) method was proposed, in which spectral data were first corrected using a standard lamp, followed by feature selection via analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine the optimal number of discriminative features. The highest classification accuracy of 80.61% was achieved when 28 features were used. Finally, a post-processing (PP) strategy was applied, where abnormal spectra in the test set were removed using density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), resulting in a final classification accuracy of 85.50%. These results demonstrate that the proposed "SCFS-PP" framework effectively enhances the reliability of cross-instrument data utilization and expands the applicability of LIBS in the field of TCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.