ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Precision-Controlled Bionic Lung Simulator for Dynamic Respiration Simulation.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation is indispensable for patients with severe respiratory conditions, and high-fidelity lung simulators play a pivotal role in ventilator testing, clinical training, and respiratory research. However, most existing simulators are passive, single-lung models with limited and discrete control over respiratory mechanics, which constrains their ability to reproduce realistic breathing dynamics. To overcome these limitations, this study presents a dual-chamber lung simulator that can operate in both active and passive modes. The system integrates a sliding mode controller enhanced by a linear extended state observer, enabling the accurate replication of complex respiratory patterns. In active mode, the simulator allows for the precise tuning of respiratory muscle force profiles, lung compliance, and airway resistance to generate physiologically accurate flow and pressure waveforms. Notably, it can effectively simulate pathological conditions such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) by adjusting key parameters to mimic the characteristic respiratory mechanics of these disorders. Experimental results show that the absolute flow error remains within ±3 L/min, and the response time is under 200 ms, ensuring rapid and reliable performance. In passive mode, the simulator emulates ventilator-dependent conditions, providing continuous adjustability of lung compliance from 30 to 100 mL/cmH2O and airway resistance from 2.01 to 14.67cmH2O/(L/s), with compliance deviations limited to ±5%. This design facilitates fine, continuous modulation of key respiratory parameters, making the system well-suited for evaluating ventilator performance, conducting human-machine interaction studies, and simulating pathological respiratory states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.