ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Neural-Operator Surrogate for Platelet Deformation Across Capillary Numbers.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physics-Informed Neural Operators for Parameter Inference in Multi-vessel Cardiovascular Networks.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Reliable multiscale models of thrombosis require platelet-scale fidelity at organ-scale cost, a gap that scientific machine learning has the potential to narrow. We trained a DeepONet surrogate on platelet dynamics generated with LAMMPS for platelets spanning ten elastic moduli and capillary numbers (0.07-0.77). The network takes as input the wall shear stress, bond stiffness, time, and initial particle coordinates and returns the full three-dimensional deformation of the membrane. Mean-squared-error minimization with Adam and adaptive learning-rate decay yields a median displacement error below 1%, a 90th percentile below 3%, and a worst case below 4% over the entire calibrated range while accelerating computation by four to five orders of magnitude. Leave-extremes-out retraining shows acceptable extrapolation: the held-out stiffest and most compliant platelets retain sub-3% median error and an 8% maximum. Error peaks coincide with transient membrane self-contact, suggesting improvements via graph neural trunks and physics-informed torque regularization. These results represent a first demonstration of how the surrogate has the potential for coupling with continuum CFD, enabling future platelet-resolved hemodynamic simulations in patient-specific geometries and opening new avenues for predictive thrombosis modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.