Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007196›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Machine and Deep Learning on Radiomic Features from Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Cancer Characterization.

Roberta Fusco, Vincenza Granata, Teresa Petrosino, Paolo Vallone, Maria Assunta Daniela Iasevoli, Mauro Mattace Raso, Sergio Venanzio Setola, Davide Pupo, Gerardo Ferrara, Annarita Fanizzi and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How Does ACR BI-RADSDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Roberta FuscoRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0469-9969
Vincenza GranataRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-3221
Teresa PetrosinoRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Paolo ValloneRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Maria Assunta Daniela IasevoliRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Mauro Mattace RasoRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Sergio Venanzio SetolaRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Davide PupoRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7967-0853
Gerardo FerraraPathology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Annarita FanizziDirezione Scientifica, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2729-9896
Raffaella MassafraSSD Fisica Sanitaria, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Miria LafranceschinaStruttura Semplice Dipartimentale di Radiodiagnostica Senologica, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Daniele La ForgiaStruttura Semplice Dipartimentale di Radiodiagnostica Senologica, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Via Orazio Flacco 65, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3902-4523
Laura GrecoRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Francesca Romana FerrantiRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Valeria De SoccioRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Antonello VidiriRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Istituto di Ricovero E Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6203-4642
Francesca BottaBreast Imaging Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3693-8899
Valeria DominelliBreast Imaging Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Enrico CassanoBreast Imaging Division, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3437-8939
Charlotte Marguerite Lucille TrombadoriDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1238-9688
Paolo BelliDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7979-2466
Giovanna TrecateDepartment of Radiodiagnostic and Magnetic Resonance, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Chiara TenconiDepartment of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Maria Carmen De SantisDe Santis Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Luca BoldriniDipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5631-1575
Antonella PetrilloRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2465-5370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of machine and deep learning approaches on radiomics features obtained by Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) and contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) in the characterization of breast cancer and in the prediction of the tumor molecular profile.

methodsA total of 153 patients with malignant and benign lesions were analyzed and underwent MRI examinations. Considering the histological findings as the ground truth, three different types of findings were used in the analysis: (1) benign versus malignant lesions; (2) G1 + G2 vs. G3 classification; (3) the presence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+ vs. HER2-). Radiomic features (n = 851) were extracted from manually segmented regions of interest using the PyRadiomics platform, following IBSI-compliant protocols. Highly correlated features were excluded, and the remaining features were standardized using z-score normalization. A feature selection process based on Elastic Net regularization (α = 0.5) was used to reduce dimensionality. Synthetic balancing of the training data was applied using the ROSE method to address class imbalance. Model performance was evaluated using repeated 10-fold cross-validation and AUC-based metrics.

resultsAmong the 153 patients enrolled in the studies, 113 were malignant lesions. Among the 113 malignant lesions, 32 had high grading (G3) and 66 had the HER2+ receptor. Radiomic features derived from both CEM and DCE-MRI showed strong discriminative performance for malignancy detection, with several features achieving AUCs above 0.80. Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) achieved the highest accuracy (0.911) and AUC (0.907) in differentiating benign from malignant lesions. For tumor grading, the neural network model attained the best accuracy (0.848), while LASSO yielded the highest sensitivity (0.667) for detecting high-grade tumors. In predicting HER2+ status, the neural network also performed best (AUC = 0.669), with a sensitivity of 0.842.

conclusionsRadiomics-based machine learning models applied to multiparametric CEM and DCE-MRI images offer promising, non-invasive tools for breast cancer characterization. The models effectively distinguished benign from malignant lesions and showed potential in predicting histological grade and HER2 status. These results demonstrate that radiomic features extracted from CEM and DCE-MRI, when analyzed through machine and deep learning models, can support accurate breast cancer characterization. Such models may assist clinicians in early diagnosis, histological grading, and biomarker assessment, potentially enhancing personalized treatment planning and non-invasive decision-making in routine practice.

Indexed as

breast cancerCEMDCE-MRIdeep learningmachine learningradiomics

Identifiers

PMID41007196
PMCPMC12467694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.