ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Structure-Preserving Histopathological Stain Normalization via Attention-Guided Residual Learning.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Staining variability in histopathological images compromises automated diagnostic systems by affecting the reliability of computational pathology algorithms. Existing normalization methods prioritize color consistency but often sacrifice critical morphological details essential for accurate diagnosis. This work proposes a novel deep learning framework, integrating enhanced residual learning with multi-scale attention mechanisms for structure-preserving stain normalization. The approach decomposes the transformation process into base reconstruction and residual refinement components, incorporating attention-guided skip connections and progressive curriculum learning. The method was evaluated on the MITOS-ATYPIA-14 dataset containing 1420 paired H&E-stained breast cancer images from two scanners. The framework achieved exceptional performance with a structural similarity index (SSIM) of 0.9663 ± 0.0076, representing 4.6% improvement over the best baseline (StainGAN). Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) reached 24.50 ± 1.57 dB, surpassing all comparison methods. An edge preservation loss of 0.0465 ± 0.0088 demonstrated a 35.6% error reduction compared to the next best method. Color transfer fidelity reached 0.8680 ± 0.0542 while maintaining superior perceptual quality (FID: 32.12, IS: 2.72 ± 0.18). The attention-guided residual learning framework successfully maintains structural integrity during stain normalization, with superior performance across diverse tissue types, making it suitable for clinical deployment in multi-institutional digital pathology workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.