Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007172›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

AI in Dentistry: Innovations, Ethical Considerations, and Integration Barriers.

Tao-Yuan Liu, Kun-Hua Lee, Arvind Mukundan, Riya Karmakar, Hardik Dhiman, Hsiang-Chen Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Navigating the ethical and legal landscape of artificial intelligence in dentistry.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tao-Yuan LiuDepartment of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, No. 2, Zhongzheng 1st Rd., Lingya District, Kaohsiung City 80284, Taiwan.
Kun-Hua LeeDepartment of Trauma, Changhua Christian Hospital, No. 135, Nanxiao St., Changhua City 50006, Taiwan.ORCID 0009-0009-6811-4614
Arvind MukundanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, No. 168, University Rd., Min Hsiung, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-3722
Riya KarmakarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, No. 168, University Rd., Min Hsiung, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan.
Hardik DhimanDepartment of Computer Science Engineering, Chandigarh University, NH-05, Ludhiana, Highway, Chandigarh State, Mohali 140413, Punjab, India.
Hsiang-Chen WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, No. 168, University Rd., Min Hsiung, Chiayi 62102, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4107-2062

Funding

Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital KAFGH_D_114029National Science and Technology Council NSTC 113-2221-E-194-011-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesArtificial Intelligence (AI) is improving dentistry through increased accuracy in diagnostics, planning, and workflow automation. AI tools, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), are being adopted in oral medicine to improve patient care, efficiency, and lessen clinicians' workloads. AI in dentistry, despite its use, faces an issue of acceptance, with its obstacles including ethical, legal, and technological ones. In this article, a review of current AI use in oral medicine, new technology development, and integration barriers is discussed.

methodsA narrative review of peer-reviewed articles in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted. Peer-reviewed articles over the last decade, such as AI application in diagnostic imaging, predictive analysis, real-time documentation, and workflows automation, were examined. Besides, improvements in AI models and critical impediments such as ethical concerns and integration barriers were addressed in the review.

resultsAI has exhibited strong performance in radiographic diagnostics, with high accuracy in reading cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan, intraoral photographs, and radiographs. AI-facilitated predictive analysis has enhanced personalized care planning and disease avoidance, and AI-facilitated automation of workflows has maximized administrative workflows and patient record management. U-Net-based segmentation models exhibit sensitivities and specificities of approximately 93.0% and 88.0%, respectively, in identifying periapical lesions on 2D CBCT slices. TensorFlow-based workflow modules, integrated into vendor platforms such as Planmeca Romexis, can reduce the processing time of patient records by a minimum of 30 percent in standard practice. The privacy-preserving federated learning architecture has attained cross-site model consistency exceeding 90% accuracy, enabling collaborative training among diverse dentistry clinics. Explainable AI (XAI) and federated learning have enhanced AI transparency and security with technological advancement, but barriers include concerns regarding data privacy, AI bias, gaps in AI regulating, and training clinicians.

conclusionsAI is revolutionizing dentistry with enhanced diagnostic accuracy, predictive planning, and efficient administration automation. With technology developing AI software even smarter, ethics and legislation have to follow in order to allow responsible AI integration. To make AI in dental care work at its best, future research will have to prioritize AI interpretability, developing uniform protocols, and collaboration between specialties in order to allow AI's full potential in dentistry.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecone-beam computed tomographyconvolutional neural networksdeep learningExplainable AImachine learningrobotic process automation

Identifiers

PMID41007172
PMCPMC12467570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.