ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Clinical Impact of Patient-Specific 3D Models in Neonatal Surgery: A Case-Based Review of Applications and Future Directions.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Patient-Specific 3D Models in Paediatric Surgery: Effect on Communication and Surgical Management.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Enhancing Surgical Planning with AI-Driven Segmentation and Classification of Oncological MRI Scans.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) modeling and printing technologies are increasingly used in pediatric surgery, offering improved anatomical visualization, surgical planning, and personalized approaches to complex conditions. Compared to standard imaging, patient-specific 3D models-virtual or printed-provide a more intuitive spatial understanding of congenital anomalies, tumors, and vascular anomalies. This review compiles evidence from pediatric surgical fields including oncology, abdominal, and thoracic surgery, highlighting the clinical relevance of 3D applications. The technological workflow-from image segmentation to computer-aided design (CAD) modeling and multimaterial printing-is described, emphasizing accuracy, reproducibility, and integration into hospital systems. Several clinical cases are presented: neuroblastoma, cloacal malformation, conjoined twins, and two cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (one with congenital pulmonary airway malformation, CPAM). In each, 3D modeling enhanced anatomical clarity, increased surgeon confidence, and supported safer intraoperative decision-making. Models also improved communication with families and enabled effective multidisciplinary planning. Despite these advantages, challenges remain, such as production time, cost variability, and lack of standardization. Future directions include artificial intelligence-based automation, expanded use of virtual and mixed reality, and prospective validation studies in pediatric cohorts. Overall, 3D modeling represents a significant advance in pediatric precision surgery, with growing evidence supporting its safety, clinical utility, and educational value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.