Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41007026›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Comparative Analysis Between Paper-Based and Online Surveys on Parental Attitudes Towards Childhood Vaccinations.

Furkan Ates, Ahmad Reza Rezaei, Julia Witkiewicz, Marta Dyszkiewicz, Dawid Lewandowski, Artur Sulik, Kacper Toczyłowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Furkan AtesDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 17, 15-274 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-4934-4156
Ahmad Reza RezaeiDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 17, 15-274 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0009-0007-6662-4405
Julia WitkiewiczDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 17, 15-274 Bialystok, Poland.
Marta DyszkiewiczDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 17, 15-274 Bialystok, Poland.
Dawid LewandowskiDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 17, 15-274 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-9004-8623
Artur SulikDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 17, 15-274 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8391-4793
Kacper ToczyłowskiDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Bialystok, Waszyngtona 17, 15-274 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0309-6987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesSurvey administration mode may significantly influence responses on polarizing health topics, yet this methodological factor remains understudied in vaccine hesitancy research. Understanding how data collection methods affect parental attitudes toward childhood vaccination is crucial for accurate public health surveillance and intervention design.

methodsThis comparative cross-sectional study examined parental attitudes toward childhood vaccination using both paper-based (

resultsKey outcomes included general vaccination support, belief in vaccine-autism links, preference for natural immunity, and communication comfort with healthcare providers. Substantial differences emerged between survey modes. Online respondents showed significantly lower vaccination support (61.92% vs. 88.48%,

conclusionsSurvey administration mode substantially influences measured parental vaccine attitudes, with online platforms capturing more vaccine-skeptical responses. These findings have critical implications for public health research methodology and suggest that mixed-mode survey designs or statistical adjustments may be necessary to obtain representative population estimates of vaccine hesitancy.

Indexed as

childhood vaccinationcognitive biasdigital misinformationhealth belief modelparental attitudessurvey methodologyvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID41007026
PMCPMC12468559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.