ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Co-Designing a National Family Handbook for Childhood Brain Tumor.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesParents report unmet information needs relating to childhood brain tumors. Existing research shows that providing information to families supports self-efficacy and well-being. The project therefore aimed to co-design resources tailored to the informational needs of families navigating childhood brain tumors in Australia.
methodsMixed methods were used across multiple phases. A landscape analysis in Phase 1 confirmed the gap in Australian resources as well as the identification of international resources suitable to inform local solutions. Following the Double Diamond Design Framework, subsequent phases of the project aimed to discover and define the problems faced by families before developing and delivering the solution. Parents of children with brain tumors participated in a journey mapping workshop, content adaptation through feedback, and an online survey to determine the preferred delivery mode of information. Clinicians provided iterative feedback as the resource was developed and refined.
resultsNine mothers participated in journey mapping and iterative adaptation of the resource along with twelve clinicians. There were 46 respondents to the survey, which identified a preference for multi-modal delivery of information, and 23 clinical and consumer reviewers in the final revision phase. The process of adaptation is presented, providing transparency on the development of this national resource.
conclusionsThe use of self-efficacy theory and co-design was pivotal in this project. Integration of concepts from self-efficacy moves beyond simply presenting information to empowering the audience to feel capable of the task ahead of them. Co-design ensured the content and tone of the resulting resource are fit-for-purpose from the perspective of both clinicians and consumers. The resource is available as a physical book, digital resource, and audiobook and disseminated through children's hospitals, professional networks, and brain tumor support groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.