Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006889›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2026

Does timing of surgery make the difference in outcomes for preterm infants with NEC?

Parvesh Mohan Garg, Jeffrey S Shenberger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Parvesh Mohan GargDepartment of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, USA. gargparvesh@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5949-7304
Jeffrey S ShenbergerDepartment of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Connecticut Children's, Hartford, CT, USA.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115428 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MED CTR · PI GOMEZ-SANCHEZ, CELSO ENRIQUE · 2016 to 2025
$38.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants with surgical NEC are managed with either peritoneal drainage (PD) or laparotomy (LAP) as the initial treatment strategy. Most infants with NEC, who ultimately require surgical care, are first managed medically, the duration of which varies across centers. The timing of surgical invention can influence clinical outcomes well beyond the acute phase of the illness. The evidence for the optimal timing for LAP in preterm infants with surgical NEC is not available. In this commentary, we highlight the evidence surrounding the impact of timing of laparotomy on the clinical outcomes in preterm infants with surgical NEC from both our own study and from information collected from a search of the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus. Most studies report mixed outcomes regarding the impact of surgical timing on clinical outcomes in preterm infants with NEC. Improved imaging methods capable of assessing the intestinal health in real time may greatly advance care and focus the temporal framework for surgical interventions. IMPACT: The timing of surgery in preterm infants impacts the surgical NEC associated morbidities. The optimal timing for surgery in preterm infants with surgical NEC needs further studies. Assessing intestinal health preoperatively in real time, as well as intraoperatively, using a combination of statistical models and non-invasive imaging, has the great potential to improve acute and long-term outcomes for infants suffering from NEC.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingInfant, Premature, DiseasesTime-to-TreatmentDrainageHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLaparotomyTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41006889
PMCPMC12498563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.