ReviewNature microbiology2025
A roadmap for equitable reuse of public microbiome data.
Review in Nature microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The FunAqua dataset of global fungal biodiversity in aquatic ecosystems.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Biodegradation of components from an oxidized polyethylene by aApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Stop codon reassignment to tryptophan in members of the bacterial phylumMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- The Iceman's microbiome: unveiling millennia of microbial diversity and continuity.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Global dataset of soil eukaryotic communities created with a uniform protocol and long read sequencing.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Paired genomic and proteomic analysis ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- WISH-barcoding of Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC14028s strains for population dynamics studies in vivo.PloS one · 2026Article
- Multifaceted human gut microbiome data associated with health and nutrition.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Goals in Nutrition Science 2025-2030.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Biohacking the human gut microbiome for precision health and therapeutic innovation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Give credit where credit is due, also for omics data.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Optimizing Tissue Lysis and DNA Extraction Protocols to Enhance Bacterial Diversity Profiling in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Microbial degradation of a widely used model polyethylene is restricted to medium- and long-chain alkanes and their oxidized derivatives.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Essential nucleic acid omics: a theoretical foundation for early-stage users.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Science benefits from rapid open data sharing, but current guidelines for data reuse were established two decades ago, when databases were several million times smaller than they are today. These guidelines are largely unfamiliar to the scientific community, and, owing to the rapid increase in biological data generated in the past decade, they are also outdated. As a result, there is a lack of community standards suited to the current landscape and inconsistent implementation of data sharing policies across institutions. Here we discuss current sequence data sharing policies and their benefits and drawbacks, and present a roadmap to establish guidelines for equitable sequence data reuse, developed in consultation with a data consortium of 167 microbiome scientists. We propose the use of a Data Reuse Information (DRI) tag for public sequence data, which will be associated with at least one Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) account. The machine-readable DRI tag indicates that the data creators prefer to be contacted before data reuse, and simultaneously provides data consumers with a mechanism to get in touch with the data creators. The DRI aims to facilitate and foster collaborations, and serve as a guideline that can be expanded to other data types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41006832What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.