Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41006794›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2025

Intratumoral heterogeneity score enhances invasiveness prediction in pulmonary ground-glass nodules via stacking ensemble machine learning.

Zhichao Zuo, Ying Zeng, Jinqiu Deng, Shanyue Lin, Wanyin Qi, Xiaohong Fan, Yujie Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhichao Zuo *Department of Radiology, Xiangtan Central Hospital, 411100, Xiangtan, Hunan Province, China.
Ying Zeng *Department of Radiology, Xiangtan Central Hospital, 411100, Xiangtan, Hunan Province, China.
Jinqiu Deng *School of Mathematics and Computational Science, Xiangtan University, 411105, Xiangtan, Hunan Province, China.
Shanyue LinDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, 541001, Guilin, The Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Wanyin QiDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, 646000, Luzhou, Sichuan Province, China.
Xiaohong FanCollege of Mathematical Medicine, Zhejiang Normal University, 321004, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China. fanxiaohong@zjnu.edu.cn.
Yujie FengCollege of Information and Intelligence, Hunan Agricultural University, 410127, Changsha, Hunan Province, China. fengyujie@smail.xtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-8965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe preoperative differentiation of adenocarcinomas in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, and invasive adenocarcinoma using computed tomography (CT) is crucial for guiding clinical management decisions. However, accurately classifying ground-glass nodules poses a significant challenge. Incorporating quantitative intratumoral heterogeneity scores may improve the accuracy of this ternary classification. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, we developed ternary classification models by leveraging insights from both base and stacking ensemble machine learning models, incorporating intratumoral heterogeneity scores along with clinical-radiological features to distinguish adenocarcinomas in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, and invasive adenocarcinoma. The machine learning models were trained, and final model selection depended on maximizing the macro-average area under the curve (macro-AUC) in both the internal and external validation sets.

resultsData from 802 patients from three centers were divided into a training set (n = 477) and an internal test set (n = 205), in a 7:3 ratio, with an additional external validation set comprising 120 patients. The stacking classifier exhibited superior performance relative to the other models, achieving macro-AUC values of 0.7850 and 0.7717 for the internal and external validation sets, respectively. Moreover, an interpretability analysis utilizing the Shapley Additive Explanation identified four key features of this ternary classification: intratumoral heterogeneity score, nodule size, nodule type, and age.

conclusionThe stacking classifier, recognized as the optimal algorithm for integrating the intratumoral heterogeneity score and clinical-radiological features, effectively served as a ternary classification model for assessing the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma in chest CT images. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Our stacking classifier integrated intratumoral heterogeneity scores and clinical-radiological features to improve the ternary classification of lung adenocarcinoma invasiveness (adenocarcinomas in situ/minimally invasive adenocarcinoma/invasive adenocarcinoma), aiding in precise diagnosis and clinical decision-making for ground-glass nodules. KEY POINTS: The intratumoral heterogeneity score effectively assessed the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma. The stacking classifier outperformed other methods for this ternary classification task. Intratumoral heterogeneity score, nodule size, nodule type, and age predict invasiveness.

Indexed as

Ground-glass nodulesIntratumoral heterogeneity scoreInvasivenessStacking classifierTernary classification model

Identifiers

PMID41006794
PMCPMC12474818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.