ArticleScientific reports2025
Autonomic heart rate variability trends predict outcome in disorders of consciousness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Assessment of Consciousness with Brain-Computer Interfaces and Artificial Intelligence: From Acquired Brain Injury to Neurodegenerative Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Long-term HRV metrics may assist in differentiating between prolonged disorders of consciousness and emergence from minimally conscious state : a cross-sectional study.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Aquatic Therapy as a Programmable Multisensory Environment for Arousal and Postural Control After Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Perspective.Brain sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disorders of consciousness (DoC), including unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS/VS) and minimally conscious state (MCS), pose significant diagnostic challenges due to their complexity and high misdiagnosis rates. This study investigates the prognostic potential of heart rate variability (HRV) ratios between stimulation and baseline, combined with support vector machine (SVM) classification, to predict outcomes in DoC patients. Fifty patients were enrolled within the first 10 days of hospitalization; 40 were used to train and optimize the SVM model, while 10 served as an independent test group. HRV analysis employed ratios of high-frequency and low-frequency components along with Sample Entropy to capture dynamic autonomic changes. Assessments were conducted weekly over three weeks. The SVM achieved 97% overall accuracy (misclassification 3%), 96% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 97% balanced accuracy during training (10-fold cross-validation: 0% misclassification). In the independent test set (N = 10), performance was 80% overall accuracy (misclassification 20%), 80% sensitivity, 80% specificity, and 80% balanced accuracy. These results highlight the value of the HRV ratio approach, particularly the early recovery of vagal response followed by sympathetic activation, in predicting patient trajectories. Although the sample size is small, our findings support the integration of HRV analysis with machine learning as a promising tool for enhancing prognostic assessments in DoC. Future research should replicate these findings in larger cohorts and incorporate longitudinal data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.